Wednesday, November 15
bram, i swear i'm going to send you and those
kids in uganda some money.
vim scp://p1k3.com//www/p1k3/archives/2006/11/15
Why didn't I know about
this sooner?
Also, geek love to Charles E. Campbell,
Jr., for writing netrw.vim and
for having the best garishly awful personal homepage background I have seen in
a month of Sundays. With a dragon, even. Dr. Campbell, you are the
man.
2006
November
15
:: read the margins
Sunday, November 12
(Posted later, incomplete thought.)
Elizabeth and I are both sitting on the couch in our bedroom, working with
text on laptops. My laptop is a Compaq Presario 2500. It is enormous, has three
case fans, and weighs almost as much as the 286 Zenith my dad had for work back
in the early 90s. Unlike the clunkily appealing Zenith, with its full-sized
keyboard and glowing blue monochrome display, it is simply ugly.
Elizabeth is using a borrowed Macintosh, which as a physical object is like
a Cooper Mini to the Compaq's late-model Chevy SUV, a Moleskine to its tattered
Meade Wide-ruled Spiral Notebook, a Parker 24 to its dried up Bic, a
Glenfiddich to its Jack & Coke...
I'll spare you the further standard observations which boil down to how the
people creating Apple's products actually design things. If you care at all
about this sort of thing, you've heard it before, and if your sensibilities are
anything like mine, you might also feel that the technological religion which
is Apple is kind of grating at this late date. Feeling morally & socially
superior for using a Mac is pretty much like earnestly believing that shopping
at Whole Foods makes you a better person.
Which is sort of a problem. There's a whole host of things which are visibly
better along some highly noticeable axis. It's not that hard to see the appeal
of Whole Foods over your local Super Wal-Mart. But it's dangerous (isn't it?)
to conflate this appeal with an all around betterness.
2006
November
12
:: write in the margins
Thursday, November 9
this isn't your little website, this is an encyclopedia.
I pick a fight over on
Wikipedia. Sort of.
2006
November
9
:: read the margins
Wednesday, November 8
I'm not sure I care too deeply, and it sure as hell ain't all that
surprising, but I think I just caught the Bill Ritter (as of yesterday,
Colorado's governor-elect) campaign (or an earnest supporter) gaming
Wikipedia.
Exhibit
A, a version of the Bill Ritter article with some text I killed, under
Missionary work
:
In 1987, Bill was a fifth-year
prosecutor working as an assistant district attorney in Denver. His career was on the rise, but he and Jeannie
decided to make a major change. They closed up their house and moved to the African nation of
Zambia, where they managed a food
distribution and nutrition center.
As lay missionaries with the Catholic Church, they trucked 60 tons of food a month from the
Zambian capital 400 miles to their depot in Mongu. They then
distributed the food deep into the drought-stricken sub-Saharan bush. Bill and
Jeannie also added poultry and fishery programs. They taught women the
importance of good nutrition and food preparation for their families. And in a
country ravaged by AIDS, malaria, leprosy and chronic malnourishment, Bill and Jeannie taught
basic health care. Nearly 35 percent of children younger than 5 suffered from
chronic malnourishment.
Bill and Jeannie's young son, August, became fast friends with the local
children. Their second son, Abe, was born in Africa. The Zambians referred to
Bill as Bo Ritta
. Bo means Mr.
, and in Silozi, a form of Bantu,
words dont end in consonants so Ritter became Ritta
.
In Africa, I learned that leadership is about listening to people,
understanding their struggles, and walking with them on the path to a better
tomorrow. We were forever inspired by the hope and spirit of the people of
Africa, even in the face of such poverty and despair.
The Ritters returned
to Denver from Zambia in 1990. Three years later, then-Gov. Roy Romer
appointed Ritter as Denvers district attorney, citing Ritters service in Africa
as an important part of the decision.
Ritter has recently unveiled a new page on his website showcasing his
three-year tour in Africa [4].
Exhibit B, the meat of
that page on his website showcasing etc.:
In 1987, Bill and Jeannie Ritter packed up their
1-year-old son and left Denver for Zambia, Africa.
For the next three years, they ran a food
distribution and nutrition center as lay
missionaries for the Catholic Church.
It's one of the most inspiring pieces of
Bill's background.
They trucked 60 tons of food a month 400
miles from the capital city to their depot
in Mongu. They then distributed the food
deep into the bush. Bill and Jeannie also
added poultry and fishery programs. They
taught women the importance of good nutrition
and food preparation for their families. And in
a country ravaged not just by drought, but also by AIDS,
malaria, leprosy and chronic malnourishment, Bill and
Jeannie taught basic health care.
Their young son, August, became fast friends with the local
children. Bill and Jeannie's second son, Abe, was born in Africa.
In Africa, Bill says, he learned that leadership is about listening to
people, understanding their struggles, and walking with them on the
path to a better tomorrow.
"We were forever inspired by the hope and spirit of the people of
Africa," Bill says, "even in the face of such poverty and despair."
(Notice the ragged linebreaks on the righthand side of that quote?
That's because on the original page, the line-lengths are carefully
tweaked to wrap around the edge of a graphic of Africa. Somewhere,
Tim Berners-Lee is weeping.)
If you were to guess that the rest of the Bill Ritter article is more or
less lifted from the same campaign site, well, a cursory look at the biography page wouldn't
do much to dispel your embittered cynicism.
I kept meaning to quit paying any further attention to this, after adding an
NPOV tag and a quick line on the talk
page about the article sounding like campaign copy, but then Editor19841 deleted
said tag with the line No POV here; if there is, cite
.
Well, ok.
And then there is this:
I'm really proud of how far this article has come, and consider it to be one
of Wikipedia's best. When I started my work on the page, it contained only one
sentence, but with some hard work and some research, we as editors have
accomplished a lot by working together. I just wanted to thank everybody
involved in the creation and forming of this great article for all your work. I
think that after a good picture of Ritter is added to this article (hopefully
next to "Contents"), I'm thinking of nominating the article to become
a feature for Wikipedia. If any of you agree with me, please say so. I'm
currently looking at possible pictures from Ritter's campaign site to add to
the article, and if anyone has a suggestion... Editor19841 00:19, 11 March 2006
(UTC)
So the question I have is, is this just someone logrolling
shilling for a politician they approve of and being fairly bad at covering
their bias / lifting the text? A link following text to the page the text was
copied & pasted from sort of points that direction. Is it an agent of the
campaign organization being really stupid about covering their tracks and/or
lazy about reusing the text? I'd buy either explanation, but I sure do get a
whiff of techno-folksie bullshit from that we as editors have accomplished a
lot by working together
paragraph.
2006
November
8
:: read the margins
Monday, November 6
slap it up!
It's been almost a year now since I and my colleagues on the shipping and
receiving dock sat down to formally codify the rules of an exciting new game
— dare I say it, a sport — we had devised over the course
of many hours, using only the materials and playing surfaces at hand. Since
then, we've all gone our separate ways, but I like to think that little burst
of autumn creativity will live on in the annals of sporting history.
Here, then, I present a key historical document retrieved from the depths of
~/home/bbearnes:
Rules of Slapball
First Edition
Issued by the Slapball Rules Committee, November
15, 2005
equipment
The slapball is roughly spherical. It should weigh between 2.4 and 3 ounces,
with a diameter of 3 to 4 inches. It is composed of an appropriate combination
of plastic shrink wrap, bubble wrap, and packing tape. The ball may be
layered, wrapped, and packed to achieve desired characteristics.
A broom or similar object may be necessary for retrieving the slapball.
playing field
Slapball is generally played on a smooth, hard surface. Indoor rooms with
walls, exposed joists, pipes, and ductwork are optimal. Streets, athletic
courts (indoor or out), and other environments are also acceptable.
rules of play
Optimal play generally requires three or more players, although fewer are
acceptable and solo play (freestyle
) is encouraged.
- Play begins when the slapball is served by bouncing it once off the floor.
Any other player may then continue play with a slap.
- A slap consists of the use of any body part to keep the ball in play, or
alive
.
- A player is allowed an unlimited number of total slaps, but may only hand
slap the ball twice in succession without a reset. A reset consists of
slapping the ball with any other body part, or of bouncing it off of any
object.
- The slapball is considered dead when it has ceased to bounce, with the
following exception:
- If the slapball lands on an object or surface above the level of the
playing floor and rolls, the slapball may be played when it rolls off an edge.
Examples would be a tabletop or cardboard box.
Given these simple rules, a surprisingly complex and athletic game emerges.
Slapball offers lower barriers to entry than, for example, the superficially
similar hacky sack. The game is initially slow paced and forgiving, since most
errors can be quickly recovered by one of the players. With experience,
however, greater confidence leads to more daring slaps, and the true scope of
potential play begins to emerge.
Elements of the playing environment substantially impact the game and expand
its possibilities — it is not just a concrete floor, it is a
concrete floor littered with pallet jacks and server hardware in boxes destined
for Mumbai. Where ceiling features such as ductwork and lighting fixtures
once seemed to threaten the untimely end of a game, the experienced slapballer
recognizes a rich and varied surface, amenable to countless bounces, rolls, and
interesting combinations.
As players incorporate more features of the court and make ever-bolder
slaps, greater effort and skill is required to continue play. Keeping the
slapball alive often means negotiating an unforgiving arena at high speed,
avoiding obstacles, and diving to perform an emergency slap just before the
last of the ball's momentum is exhausted.
Playing slapball also turns out to have a unique social dimension, for
slapball is basically a cooperative game, in two important senses:
First, although it would be easy to devise a competitive scoring method, the
highest level of play seems to be achieved by working towards the shared goal
of sustaining the game for as long as possible, in the most interesting
fashion. Rhythms of play emerge, with bursts of intense cross-court activity
following risky slaps, and improvised solos
, extended series of slaps by
individual players, become integral to the flow of the game.
Second, at least in its native arena, slapball is fundamentally a
transgressive and anti-authoritarian activity, and to-date has always taken
place in an environment of surveillance. The true obstacles to the continuation
of play were not crates of drive arrays, or piles of freshly delivered FedEx
packages — they were irate, chainsmoking Xerox site management and needy
Sun employees, and avoiding their wrath was crucial to the continuation of the
game.
2006
November
6
:: write in the margins
Saturday, November 4
So Levi wrote last night asking for some help with the citations in his
dissertation. He's using LaTeX, with BibTeX (what else?) for the cites.
Figuring out why it wasn't working (he was using an outdated style file) was
more painful than it should have been, but I learned a few things in the
process.
I was going to do a detailed write-up here, but when I began contemplating
the level of exposition it would take to make a useful and interesting
narrative (even playing fast and loose with the meaning of interesting
),
I became incredibly discouraged.
Instead, I will just list some things that
might be useful if you find yourself trying to do APSR-style cites and LaTeX
keeps crapping out on you.
more: harvard
2006
November
4
:: write in the margins
All original content on p1k3, unless otherwise noted, is
released to the public domain.